Accepted 2025 July 12 ; Published 2025 July 13

Journal of Educational Theory, 2025, 2(1), 3079-5931.

View PDFDownload PDFArchive (OJS)

Grounded in social-cognitive learning theory and the cross-cultural adaptation framework, this mixed-methods study tests how culturally adaptive feedback (CAF) delivered through an information-interaction system affects university EFL learners’ language-learning motivation and learning outcomes. One hundred and twenty second-year students were randomly allocated to a CAF group and a control group for eight weeks. The quantitative phase employed a 2 (group) × 2 (time) mixed-design ANOVA; the qualitative phase conducted semi-structured interviews with 18 learners, followed by thematic analysis. The findings are as follows: (1) post-test motivation in the CAF group was significantly higher than in the control group, group × time interaction F(1, 118)=15.27, p = .0002, partial η² = .115; (2) the growth rate of learning outcomes in the CAF group significantly surpassed that of the control group, interaction F(1, 118)=12.45, p = .0007, partial η² = .095, end-point Cohen’s d = 2.04; and (3) three high-frequency themes—“enhanced self-efficacy,” “high cultural relevance,” and “increased engagement”—were distilled from the interviews, corroborating the motivation-to-outcome pathway. The study extends the explanatory power of CAF in cross-cultural language learning, demonstrates the motivational amplification generated by culturally contextualised feedback in tandem with self-efficacy, and provides empirical evidence for feedback design in online platforms and classroom practice.

Information-interaction System , Culturally Adaptive Feedback , Language-learning Motivation , Learning Outcomes , Cross-cultural Education .

APA Style

Li, X. & Fang, L. (2025). The impact of culturally adaptive feedback in information-interaction systems on language-learning motivation and outcomes. Journal of Educational Theory, 2(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.70393/6a6574.333036

The authors thank the editor and anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments and valuable suggestions.

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.