Improving Response Efficiency in Cross-Time Zone Sales Follow-Up: A Quantitative Analysis Based on Process Optimization and Key Performance Metrics

Xiangmin Li

doi:10.70393/616a736d.333336

OPEN ACCESS |Research Article ||15 November 2025

Improving Response Efficiency in Cross-Time Zone Sales Follow-Up: A Quantitative Analysis Based on Process Optimization and Key Performance Metrics

Xiangmin Li

Ym Trading Limited

meisson.lee@gmail.com

Ym Trading Limited, Denver, CO 80202, USA.

* Corresponding Author¹: Xiangmin Li, E-Mail: meisson.lee@gmail.com

Publication

Accepted 2025 October 31 ; Published 2025 November 15

Academic Journal of Sociology and Management, 2025, 3(6), 3005-5040.

Abstract

In today's global economic and business environment, cross-time zone sales management presents significant challenges and opportunities. Based on this, this paper proposes a method to improve overall email interaction, response, and conversion rates by optimizing email follow-up time in cross-time zone sales processes. This optimization incorporates various factors, including email timezone, industry standards, and recipient behavior. The paper analyzes a well-known SaaS company, utilizing strategic follow-up optimization methods to examine its customer response time and conversion rates through research and algorithmic analysis. The results show a consistency between email follow-up time and customer preferences, indicating that partial matching can improve overall sales performance. Key metrics include email open rate, response rate, conversion rate, and response time optimization strategies. Testing revealed an effective tool for improving efficiency, making it a viable framework for managing sales across time zones.

Keywords

Sales Optimization , Cross-Time Zone Management；Follow-Up Timing , Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) .

Metadata

DOI:

10.70393/616a736d.333336

ARK:

ark:/40704/AJSM.v3n6a03

Pages: 14-19

References: 13

Disciplines: Business

Subjects: Marketing

Cite This Article

APA Style

Li, X. (2025). Improving response efficiency in cross-time zone sales follow-up: a quantitative analysis based on process optimization and key performance metrics. Academic Journal of Sociology and Management, 3(6), 14-19. https://doi.org/10.70393/616a736d.333336

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the editor and anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments and valuable suggestions.

FUNDING

Not applicable.

INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD STATEMENT

Not applicable.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

INFORMED CONSENT STATEMENT

Not applicable.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Not applicable.

References

1.

Piechowski, M., & Meller, A. (2023, July). Use of KPI indicators to optimize production process performance–case study. In International Symposium on Distributed Computing and Artificial Intelligence (pp. 3-12). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.

2.

Joppen, R., von Enzberg, S., Gundlach, J., Kühn, A., & Dumitrescu, R. (2019). Key performance indicators in the production of the future. Procedia CIRP, 81, 759-764.

3.

Steckel, J. H., Gupta, S., & Banerji, A. (2004). Supply chain decision making: Will shorter cycle times and shared point-of-sale information necessarily help?. Management science, 50(4), 458-464.

4.

Imam, M. H., & Chowdhury, M. (2025). TO WHAT EXTENT DOES THE USE OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT–ORIENTED DIGITAL COLLABORATION TOOLS AFFECT DELIVERY TIMELINES IN REMOTE TECH TEAMS?. International Journal of Scientific Interdisciplinary Research, 6(1), 163-184.

5.

Amin, R., Kushwaha, B. P., & Miah, M. H. (2023). The process optimization method of the optimal online sales model of information product demand concerning the spillover effect. Journal of International Logistics and Trade, 21(2), 62-83.

6.

Imediegwu, C. C., & Elebe, O. K. E. O. G. H. E. N. E. (2020). Optimizing CRM-based sales pipelines: A business process reengineering model. IRE Journals, December, 4(6).

7.

Singh, J., Flaherty, K., Sohi, R. S., Deeter-Schmelz, D., Habel, J., Le Meunier-FitzHugh, K., ... & Onyemah, V. (2019). Sales profession and professionals in the age of digitization and artificial intelligence technologies: concepts, priorities, and questions. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 39(1), 2-22.

8.

Terje Karlsen, J., Græe, K., & Jensvold Massaoud, M. (2008). Building trust in project‐stakeholder relationships. Baltic journal of management, 3(1), 7-22.

9.

Velimirović, D., Velimirović, M., & Stanković, R. (2011). Role and importance of key performance indicators measurement. Serbian Journal of Management, 6(1), 63-72.

10.

Aithal, P. S., & Aithal, S. (2023). Key performance indicators (KPI) for researchers at different levels & strategies to achieve it. International Journal of Management, Technology, and Social Sciences (IJMTS), 8(3), 294-325.

11.

Setiawan, I., & Purba, H. H. (2020). A systematic literature review of key performance indicators (KPIs) implementation. Journal of Industrial Engineering & Management Research, 1(3), 200-208.

12.

Motawa, I. A., Khosrowshahi, F., & Kaka, A. P. (2005, September). Development and evaluation of a company-level budgeting technique incorporating future construction contracts. In Proceedings of the 2005 21st Annual ARCOM Conference (pp. 7-9).

13.

Bhattacharya, S., & Agnihotri, A. (2025). DocuSign: Pursuing Growth Through Land and Expand Strategy. SAGE Publications: SAGE Business Cases Originals.

PUBLISHER'S NOTE

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Copyright © 2025 The Author(s). Published by Southern United Academy of Sciences.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.