Current Issue

All articles published in this issue have undergone a thorough peer review process, and stringent checks for repetition rates have been implemented to ensure the integrity of the content.

Total number of articles in this issue: 1
Total number of pages in this issue: 5

For inquiries regarding the content of specific articles, please feel free to contact the respective authors via their provided email addresses. For questions related to the journal itself, please reach out directly to SUAS Press.

Year

2025

Volume

2

Number

3

Status

Archived

Published

2025 June 20

Articles

Spillover Effects of Carbon Emission Trading on the Green Supply-Chain Finance Network

Against the backdrop of China’s deepening “dual-carbon” strategy, this paper systematically evaluates the spillover effects of Carbon Emission Trading (CET) on the Green Supply-Chain Finance Network (GSCFN). We first construct a three-tier transmission framework—“technological innovation → financing environment → chainwide collaboration”—to reveal, in theory, how CET price signals reallocate capital and diffuse across supply-chain nodes. Using a balanced panel of 420 listed manufacturing and power-sector firms from 2015–2023 and a fixed-effects model, we find: (i) a 0.1-unit increase in CET intensity raises green patent output by 0.8–1.0 items (p < 0.05); (ii) monetising carbon assets lowers green-loan interest rates by 38–45 basis points and boosts the supply-chain collaboration index by 2.4–3.1 percentage points; (iii) carbon-price stability significantly moderates firms’ green-investment willingness, and cross-regional tests confirm heterogeneous capital flows under different ETS designs. This study extends the literature at the intersection of carbon-market externalities and supply-chain finance, offering empirical support for carbon-market design and corporate practice under the dual-carbon goal. Policy recommendations include (a) a carbon-price corridor to stabilise expectations, (b) acceptance of carbon-asset income rights as collateral, and (c) leveraging leading firms’ contractual externalities to drive upstream- and downstream-level decarbonisation. Future work could employ spatial econometrics and network models, incorporating dynamic ESG scores and on-site verification data to depict cross-chain and cross-regional diffusion speed and intensity more precisely.

DOI10.70393/6a6574626d.333033ARKark:/40704/JETBM.v2n3a01

Copyright © 2026 The Author(s). Published by Southern United Academy of Sciences.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.