Research on Different Need Theories in Pedagogy

Bruno Ernandes·da Silva Lemos

doi:10.70393/6a6574.323538

OPEN ACCESS |Research Article ||20 December 2024

Research on Different Need Theories in Pedagogy

Bruno Ernandes·da Silva Lemos

Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona

stegvition@hotmail.com

Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain.

* Corresponding Author¹: Bruno Ernandes·da Silva Lemos, E-Mail: stegvition@hotmail.com

Publication

Accepted 2024 September 27 ; Published 2024 December 20

Journal of Educational Theory, 2024, 1(2_Spec), 3079-5931.

Abstract

This paper delves into the application and significance of various need theories within the realm of pedagogy. By exploring Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs, Alderfer's ERG theory, and McClelland's Achievement Need Theory, it aims to provide educators with a comprehensive understanding of students' needs. This understanding is crucial for creating effective educational environments, enhancing teaching - learning processes, and promoting students' overall development. Through in - depth analysis of these theories, this research offers insights into how to better meet students' diverse needs in educational settings.

Keywords

Various Need Theories , Educational Environment , Theory Research .

Metadata

DOI:

10.70393/6a6574.323538

ARK:

ark:/40704/JET.v1n2spec01

Pages: 1-7

References: 10

Disciplines: Educational Psychology

Subjects: Learning Motivation

Cite This Article

APA Style

Lemos, B.E.S. (2024). Research on different need theories in pedagogy. Journal of Educational Theory, 1(2_Spec), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.70393/6a6574.323538

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the editor and anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments and valuable suggestions.

FUNDING

Not applicable.

INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD STATEMENT

Not applicable.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

INFORMED CONSENT STATEMENT

Not applicable.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Not applicable.

References

1.

Newstetter, W. C. , & Mccracken, W. M. . (2001). Chapter 4 – novice conceptions of design : implications for the design of learning environments. Design Knowing & Learning Cognition in Design Education, 63-77.

2.

Mcloughlin, C. E. . (2013). The pedagogy of personalised learning: exemplars, moocs and related learning theories.

3.

Mcdaniel, D. S. . (2024). Toward culturally digitized pedagogy: informing theory, research, and practice. Reading Research Quarterly, 59(2).

4.

Emad, G. R. . (2010). Introduction of technology into workplace and the need for change in pedagogy. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2( 2), 875-879.

5.

Jeong, Ae, & You. (2011). Kinesiology pedagogy: another role of sport pedagogy. Korean Journal of Sport Pedagogy, 18(4), 1-17.

6.

Mckenzie, J. . (2011). The real in the reel: the need for critically reflective teachers in the media classroom. Pacific-Asian Education Journal.

7.

Dixon, C. O. . (1973). Planarians and pedagogy: can a flatworm find happiness in learning research?. Educational Technology, N/A.

8.

Danguang, P. , & Mintao, D. . (2018). Pedagogy investigation on abstract theories materialized of structural mechanics. Journal of Architectural Education in Institutions of Higher Learning.

9.

Sack, A. L. , Singh, P. , & Dipaolo, T. . (2009). Spectator motives for attending professional women's tennis events: linking marketing and maslow's hierarchy of needs theory. International Journal of Sport Management & Marketing, 6(1).

10.

Fowler, S. . (2014). What maslow's hierarchy won't tell you about motivation. Harvard Business Review Digital Articles.

PUBLISHER'S NOTE

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Copyright © 2025 The Author(s). Published by Southern United Academy of Sciences.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Table of Content