Current Issue

All articles published in this issue have undergone a thorough peer review process, and stringent checks for repetition rates have been implemented to ensure the integrity of the content.

Total number of articles in this issue: 1
Total number of pages in this issue: 8

For inquiries regarding the content of specific articles, please feel free to contact the respective authors via their provided email addresses. For questions related to the journal itself, please reach out directly to SUAS Press.

Year

2025

Volume

2

Number

3

Status

Archived

Published

2025 July 30

Articles

Assessing Potential Mars Landing Sites Based on Groundwater-Induced Hydrated Mineralogy and Geomorphology

As the thorough exploration of Mars H2O, identifying the existence of a Martian biosphere becomes imperative. This paper discussing hydrated minerals on Mars offers a critical pathway to assessing its past habitability and potential subsurface biosphere. This study presents a multi-criteria evaluation of three candidate landing sites—Danielson Crater, Aram Chaos, and southwest Arabia Terra—selected for their scientific relevance to aqueous processes and their compliance with engineering constraints for future surface missions. Using integrated datasets from CRISM, HiRISE, MOLA, and other orbital instruments, the analysis emphasizes morphological diversity, mineralogical signatures, and preservation potential. Danielson Crater is identified as the most favorable site, combining well-preserved stratigraphy with strong evidence of phyllosilicate-rich layered deposits. This framework can serve as a reference for future Mars exploration missions targeting signs of past groundwater activity and habitability.

DOI10.70393/616a6e73.333038ARKark:/40704/AJNS.v2n3a01

Copyright © 2026 The Author(s). Published by Southern United Academy of Sciences.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.